This example uses example Cimetidine data from the EXPO software
Now assuming you have an acceptable peak profile list, it is time to try
and index the powder diffraction pattern.
As possibly repeated elsewhere, for organics, it can be best to scope the range of possible results by running ALL the indexing programs (ito, treor, treor, taup, kohl, lzon and fjzn). In this example, this might seem quite contrived as the result is quite obvious (we already know the true answer), but in most cases, being to lax on scoping the possible range of solutions could put you in a world of pain! For example, on standard laboratory instruments where alignment and sample preparation are of high quality, you might still be lucky to get Figure Of Merits greater than 10 on large cell organics. As per the Crysfire tutorials, run XF2CRYS to convert the XFIT.TXT file into a Crysfire *.CDT file. (The wavelength in this case is 1.52904 Angstrom) For brevity of this tutorial (though you can be running Chekcell concurrently with Crysfire), run All 7 elligible programs (ito, treor, treor, taup, kohl, lzon and fjzn). Whem prompted, a rule of thumb is to use around 25 peaks, but everyone has their favourite values when these is an excess of peaks to choose from)
|
In this example, it is obvious which is the "most likely" cell but in a larger cell, you may have a number of different cells with close FOM's such that closer examination will be necessary. Le Bail whole profile fitting might help you and at worse case, you may have to try to solve the structure using the different cells to see which gives the most reasonable answer. A few things to look out for include doubling and halving of cell volumes as an indicator of possible "true" cells.
20 456.0 1279.51 1.00 P ITO12/log 15Apr00 01:27:31 141 10.3918 18.8147 6.8230 90.000 106.437 90.000 100.661 28.249 233.503 .000 86.762 .000 crys = crys 20 453.4 1279.650 1.00 P DICVOL91/log 15Apr00 01:34:20 Mon__1 10.3922 18.8153 6.8233 90.000 106.437 90.000 100.653 28.247 233.483 .000 86.756 .000 crys = crys 20 446.48 1279.638 1.00 P LZONv6.22g 15Apr00 01:42:02 70001 10.3922 18.8152 6.8233 90.000 106.437 90.000 100.6535 28.2476 233.4844 .0000 86.7544 .0000 crys = crys 20 446.48 1279.638 1.00 P LZONv6.22g 15Apr00 01:42:02 20001 10.3922 18.8152 6.8233 90.000 106.437 90.000 100.6535 28.2476 233.4844 .0000 86.7544 .0000 crys = crys 20 446.47 1279.638 1.00 P FJZNv6.21a 15Apr00 01:38:30 121 10.3922 18.8152 6.8233 90.000 106.437 90.000 100.6535 28.2476 233.4844 .0000 86.7543 .0000 crys = crys 20 446.29 1279.638 1.00 P FJZNv6.21a 15Apr00 01:38:30 123 10.3922 18.8152 6.8233 90.000 106.437 90.000 100.6535 28.2476 233.4843 .0000 86.7543 .0000 crys = crys 20 426.0 1279.679 1.00 P DICVOL91/log 15Apr00 01:34:20 Mon__2 10.6969 18.8157 6.8233 90.000 111.281 90.000 100.653 28.246 247.374 .000 114.540 .000 crys = crys 20 420.11 2559.286 2.00 B KOHLv6.20h 15Apr00 01:36:56 8 19.9573 18.8153 6.8232 90.000 92.705 90.000 25.1633 28.2473 215.2714 .0000 6.9472 .0000 crys = crys 20 167.52 5118.269 4.00 B KOHLv6.20h 15Apr00 01:36:56 10 20.7853 18.8140 13.6460 90.000 106.435 90.000 25.1607 28.2514 58.3749 .0000 21.6859 .0000 crys = crys 20 162 1279.753 1.00 P TREOR90/log 15Apr00 01:34:54 Mon__1 10.3921 18.8173 6.8232 90.000 106.438 90.000 100.6558 28.2413 233.4924 .0000 86.7631 .0000 crys = crys 20 138.4 2559.74 2.00 P ITO12/log 15Apr00 01:27:31 666 13.6490 18.8158 10.3917 90.000 106.433 90.000 58.348 28.246 100.659 .000 43.361 .000 crys = crys 20 138.2 2559.74 2.00 P ITO12/log 15Apr00 01:27:31 667 13.6490 18.8158 10.3917 90.000 106.433 90.000 58.348 28.246 100.659 .000 43.361 .000 crys = crys 20 107.29 2559.415 2.00 P LZONv6.22g 15Apr00 01:42:02 30001 13.6492 18.8144 10.3910 90.000 106.433 90.000 58.3464 28.2501 100.6730 .0000 43.3638 .0000 crys = crys 20 81.65 7679.006 6.00 B KOHLv6.20h 15Apr00 01:36:56 16 20.4708 18.8150 19.9594 90.000 92.698 90.000 23.9163 28.2483 25.1575 .0000 2.3090 .0000 crys = crys |
Now run Chekcell and we can graphically go through this mass of results. When prompted, the wavelength used for the peak positions is 1.52904 Angstrom
|
Performing a spacegroup assignment using the Best Group option in Chekcell suggests that P 21/A could be the best spacegroup. Thus the result is:
This automatica spacegroup assignment should only be used as a guide and the other spacegroups manually browsed through to see the differences in observed and calculated lines.
|
Also note, as per the peak profiling page, that those low angle shoulders are most likely due to something weird in the XRD geometry and sample preparation.
The cell also calculates a HKL at a peak we missed in the peak profiling. (minor confidence booster)
The conditions used for assigning the spacegroup are viewable as well if you wish.
|