It should be noted that the Analytical face index absorption correction
is better to use than the traditional Gaussian as the results
of the Gaussian absorption correction can be variable depending
on the Grid Size used inside Platon (the finer the Grid Size, the
longer the calculations take, but the more accurate the absorption
correction). The Platon based Analytical absorption correction
that WinGX uses gets around this Grid Size problem and is identical
in ease of use to the method below, just select the Analytical option.
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 17:17:09 +0100
To: L.M.D.Cranswick@dl.ac.uk (L. Cranswick)
From: Louis Farrugia
Subject: Tutorials
Actually there are pro's and cons with Analtyical vs Gaussian
The advantages of the analytical correction are
(a) it much faster (at least by a factor of 4)
(b) it is (theoretically) completely correct assuming the crystal has been
measured correctly (virtually impossible to verify)
The Gaussian correction does depend for its accuracy on the grid
size, as you state. In PLATON, the grid is normally chosen automatically,
but you canset it manually as well. This latter option has not yet been
implemented in the GUI
The disadvantage of the analytical method is that sometimes (perhaps
1 in several thousand goes) the transmission function is incorrectly
calculated.
|